The recent news about the Colts' decision to call Philip Rivers, an aging veteran, has left many football fans, including Cam Newton, questioning the team's strategy. Newton, a talented quarterback in his own right, is eight years younger than Rivers, and he can't help but wonder why he wasn't considered for the role.
In a recent podcast, Newton expressed his disappointment, calling the Colts' lack of interest "a slap in the face." It's a bold statement, but one that resonates with many fans who are curious about the team's decision-making process.
Newton's last NFL appearance was in 2021, where he finished the season with the Panthers. Meanwhile, Rivers last played in 2020. So, why didn't the Colts give Newton a shot, especially when they were willing to consider a player much further along in his career?
On the surface, Newton's argument holds weight. After all, he hasn't retired and has consistently shown his dedication to the game. He never signed that symbolic one-day contract with the Panthers, a move many players make to signify the end of their careers.
"I did not, and will not, because of an opportunity like this," Newton emphasized.
However, the Colts' decision might have been influenced by more than just age. With Anthony Richardson injured and no veteran backup acquired for Daniel Jones, Rivers' extensive knowledge of the offense and his relationship with head coach Shane Steichen made him an appealing emergency option.
But here's where it gets controversial: Is Rivers truly the best choice for the Colts in this situation? Some argue that Newton, with his youth and talent, could have been a more dynamic option. Unless Rivers performs exceptionally well from the get-go, it's fair to question whether the Colts made the right call.
What do you think? Is Newton being too hard on the Colts, or do you agree that he should have been given a chance? Let's discuss in the comments and share our thoughts on this intriguing football dilemma!
